Tupac Shakur is Alive
In my last post, I displayed evidence proving that the apollo moon landing was fake. Now, I'll educate you on another conspiricy theory.You don't have to like Tupac Shakur to be interested in this story. Tupac was supposedly murdered in a drive-by shooting in September of 1996. However, many friends and family of the rapper say that he is still alive somewhere, and there evidence to prove this theory.
After his "death," an album was released. Makaveli: Don Killuminati: The 7 Day Theory. The first part is a reference to Niccol Machiavelli, an Itallian philosopher who believed that faking one's death was a sure way to fool enemies. Perhaps this is Tupac's message to the world that things aren't all that they seem to be.
Of course, that doesn't proove anything. 14 months after his death, the album R U Still Down? was released. Tupac starred in three videos promoting the album. When asked about this, his manager said that Tupac as a forward thinking man and filmed the videos 2 months before his death. Coincidence? I don't think so.
In 1998, Tupac's Greatest Hits was released. As with all albums released after his "death" the songs were said to be recorded long ago. However, the album featured 6 new songs, and in one song, Shakur makes reference to the film Armagedden, which came out long after his death. In another, he congratulates the Denver Broncos on winning the superbowl, which also hapened after his death.
We may never know the truth, but there is no denying that the evidence is intriquing. There are more facts out there and all those interested should google something like "Tupac Alive?" to find links. Peace.
posted by Bobby M at 4:33 PM
15 Comments:
Tupac is still alive...in the hearts of his fans.
Liam-You're turning into Dan Brown! Take it slow with the conspiracy theories my brother!
Good luck with the Senate elections.
2:12 PM
By the way, man, just so you know, the Pope never said ANYTHING about the Da Vinci Code, (Leonardo Code), and you're just blaming an innocent man. It was another Vatican Cardinal that called for a boycott.
3:49 PM
I don't need to see the movie. I've read enough about it. Plus, I don't want to give my own money (taxpayers dollars, may I add) to see a movie that openly opposes everything I believe in. Our BEST movie is good enough. Plus, from what I hear, it isn't even a good movie at all! Imagine that! A stupid story, with an evil message, with crummy research, with no historical facts backing it up, based on a poorly written novel,...wow! How could that end up bad? That seems to be just all the right ingredients for the liberal media! It must really blow on ice now.
Please don't try again, I am very unlikely to change my mind.
This is just the kind of bull that Jesus predicted when he said we would become the most persecuted church in history. We're the safest target ever. Could you imagine giving this crap to the JEWS? The Muslims? Out of the question. It's because the liberal media hates us! Attack the Jews, you get isolated from society and everyone hates you. Attack the Muslims and you wake up dead the next morning. Attack the Catholics and you get praised and people pay to see your crappy movies. This is the kind of trash we've seen in the past, we're seeing now, and we'll very likely see again.
It's almost June 6, '06. Just about time for people like you to be praising the Da Vinci Code.
9:29 PM
First you want me to pay money, and now you want me to break federal laws to insult my church? Wow, Lee. And I have read some passages from the book, and do find it very offensive. I've also seen some clips from the movie.
Maybe I should start an internet rumor that Dan Brown's next book is about Mohammed. That would take care of Dan Brown.
4:34 PM
I don't think these accusations are true. I'm just annoyed that others do without knowing all the facts. I'm worried for them. It's for their own good.
And you're right, Catholics are peaceful people. If you've been paying attention, we've been handling it very peacefully so far. The Church, the same church that opposed both Gulf Wars, invented the separation of church and state, has been trying to support life in cases of unwanted pregnancy, and has been in institution since the year 33 AD, we've been handling it very peacefully. We can obviously handle criticism, as we are criticised, targeted, and scapegoated so often. The Pope hasn't even addressed these silly claims as he has much more important things to be doing. Good thing it was us and not anotehr church. There'd have been blood spilled already.
3:38 PM
The Dan Brown is Satan thing was a joke. I'm 100% positive that I never said that Tom Hanks stuff. I, as a habit, never say "I hate." It's too strong and mean. And a priest once said to me, "when you hate, haven't you already commited murder in your heart?" and that seemed to make sense. I've been pretty civil about this whole Code trash, if you read my latest comment. And the thing about Mohammed was to stress a point. And I think it worked well.
Lee: I think that last comment of yours was just because you couldn't come up with anything to say, you didn't want to respond to my last comment becasue you know I'm beating you, and you decided to make things up. Kind of reminds me of Dan Brown.
9:16 PM
Still not responding to anything I said...
Liam, you made that up. Hey, it wouldn't be the first time. You tried to blame Anti-Code stuff on the pope. Don't worry, I don't blame you: making up information and claiming it to be true: The Da Vinci Code certainly has had an effect on you.
6:36 PM
Big Lee...you're so wrong...you are the one with the closed mind. I considered all of Danny's points. I gave them a fair chance. I also looked at THE OTHER EVIDENCE. I looked at TWICE THE STUFF THAT YOU DID. And just think about it! If Jesus was married, well, fine with me. I'd be very happy. The whole church would be. We'd make it professed everywhere and loved by everyone. BUT HE WASN'T. We want people to know the Jesus that really was. That's the Catholic goal in life: to know, love, and serve the lord. We need to know who he really was, and he was not whoever the bogus crap from Dan Brown said. We want people to know the truth.
And by the way, that post was about Wallace and Gromit. !? Where does the Code fit in? Are you just doing this to bother me? You know I won.
9:24 PM
I also have way more profile views than you do.
9:25 PM
What are you talking about? Dan Brown got ZERO facts straight! You were obviously too lazy to read my comment, as you were too lazy to pay attention to anything said by another person than DAN BROWN!
Dead Sea Scrolls were early Christian documents:WRONG! They never even mentioned the name of Jesus. They were written by Jews.
Leonardo belonged to the Priory of Sion:WRONG! The Priory of Sion began in France in 1956.
Da Vinci was Leonardo's name:WRONG! It means of Vinci, the town he was born in.
Opus Dei has monks:WRONG! It's for lay people.
Jesus's works were recorded by thousands of followers:WRONG! He didn't even have thousands of followers, let alone literate ones.
Jesus wasn't devine until the Council of Nicea:WRONG! Writings about Jesus mentioned him as God from the early fourth century at latest.
Dead Sea Scrolls were found in the 1950s:WRONG! They were found in 1947.
Mary Magdelene was in the House of Benjamin:WRONG! And even if she was, this still wouldn't make her a descendant of David, or royal at all.
Some of these I figured out myself, others come from books like "Truth and Fiction in the Da Vinci Code."
2:55 PM
What the hell are you talking about? You're giving me opinion. I gave you FACTS, good hard, solid, facts, thing that are the same for everyone, no matter if ypou believe in Jesus or not, things that can be proven. You were obviously too lazy to read the whole comment.
The thing that really gets me mad is that people like you think this is new. You and Danny-Poo think that you found something revolutionary that we have never seen before and are challenging our religion for the first time. You couldn't possibly be more wrong, even if you thought the moon was made of green cheese. Our church has been persecuted constantly, ever since it's creation in 33AD. It is the most persecuted church in Human history. Check out some facts:
Jesus Christ, Church founder: Was scourged and crucified by the Romans just for preaching peace.
St Peter, first Pope: Was crucified upside down in Rome just for preaching Jesus's message.
St. Paul, Doctor of the Church: Was beheaded in Rome by the government, they wanted to crucify him but could not because he was a Roman citizen. Such a cruel and sadistic punishment was not allowed for other countrymen.
St. Stephen, first martyr: Was stoned to death by the Jewish Pharisees, just for following Jesus.
St. Bartholomew, Apostale: Skinned alive by the Armenians for teaching about Jesus.
All of the Apostales were martyred (killed) in cruel and unusual ways except St. John. John was attempted to be killed by being burned in a pot of boiling liquid but miraculously survived.
St. Maximillion Kolbe: Gased to death in the Houlocaust at a Nazi Concentration Camp. He just visited the prisoners to pray with them, but volunteered his own life in place of a Jewish family.
These are just some examples of what people like Dan Brown have tried to do to our church, but have all failed. They can kill us, persecute us, and torture us, but they cannot change what we believe. It is interesting to note that in a church constantly persecuted, martyrdom is the ultimate honor. Turn the other cheek my Catholic ass.
11:58 AM
The hypocrisy of your argument is unbelievable. You are the attackers, you are the persecuters, we have been on the defense since the very beginning. Youy are the ones who are closed minded, who insult people just because of what they believe. You are the ones who need to be more tolerant. You are the ones who might find it hard to believe that there are people who actually think differently than you. You are not ashamed to insult 2 billion people.
Those were all facts. The Dead Sea Scrolls were found in 1947 for example. How is that opinion? That's a fact! That cannot be argued! That's when it happened! Get over it! Leonardo is from Vinci. How is that opinion? Opus Dei is for Lay People. What the hell are you talking about?
And please don't say that we aren't accepting. The Catholic church has a famous record for being the most accepting religion of all. Jesus talked to the lepers when everyone was too afraid to go near them. St. Maximillion Kolbe gave his life up for a Jewish family. We sainted Joan of Arc when people were calling her a witch. When faced with the difficult question of whether to convert a gentile, whom all the Jews weren't allowed to talk to, St. Peter, our first Pope, said yes. We are without a doubt the most accepting religion in Human history.
You, however, can only see thinsg from your ridiculous, disproven point of view.
Who's more accepting?
6:59 PM
Liam, just give up. You cannot win. You know I'm right, and you're just too stubborn and lazy to admit it. You're one of the biggest hypacrits I've ever met. You have presented me an amazing ZERO FACTS! I've given you at least 20! And yes, all facts.
You see, precious Danny doesn't really think the Priory of Sion wasn't founded when it was in 1956, that part of the story is just as fictional as the part that says Robert Langdon is a real Prefessor of Symbologists at Harvard. Please don't tell me you believe that part too. Dan Brown writs fiction, Liam. Pure fantasy. He even stated in an interview that his wife did all the research for the Da Vinci Code. And I don't mind. Let him right all his silly stories all he wants. It's when lazy stupid people like yourself believe it to be true without looking at the facts. For that matter, why don't you go hang out with Zeus in Narnia while eating some of Jack's magic beans?
If you still don't believe me (which you probably don't, with your stubborn track record) look it up on Wikipedia, and encyclopedia, a book, anywhere online, a book about fact in the Da Vinci Code, or anywhere you trust. Find out when the Priory of Sion was founded. Do the research. I did. Get off your ass and do some research! Tell me what you find out.
It's kind of interesting, but I find your weak and ridiculous arguements have made me all the better for it. Not only do I enjoy giving you a solid thrashing, but in a church where martyrdom is honored and persecution is guarenteed, I think it's helping me out. So persecute all you want. Do your worst (it's not that bad anyway). I'll win in the end, and I'll be all teh stronger for it.
5:01 PM
I feel so sorry for you Bobby. So sorry. You seem unable of understanding the easiest things. I don't know why. And you seem nrevous about talking straight to me, I don't know why else you would never address the things I ask you on my comments. You always seem to come up with something ridiculous that I never mentioned in my comment. You never address my strongest arguements because you are too afraid and you know that I am right. I feel sorry.
For the record, I never mentioned Lord of the Rings. And when I used Narnia as an example, that was because I know that noone believes it. Do you know anyone who does? But the Code is just as ficticious, but you believe it! Isn't that so annoying? As I said in a comment you probably didn't read, the goal of a Catholic's life is to KNOW, love and serve the lord. We need to spread the truth so all can know him. We don't want people to believe this silly stuff.
You never cease to amaze me with your hypocrisy!
9:45 PM
Wow, Bobby. I and only thought you were a hypacrit. You're also an idot I guess.
Why can't you realise that facts are the same for all religions? (Just for the record, it's not just Catholics Dan Brown has offended, but all 2 billion Christians.) The Dead Sea Scrolls were found in 1947 for Catholics, Muslims, Jews, Satan worshipers, and Dan Brown. It's all the same. I never said Dan Brown's religious beliefs were wrong. I don't even know what Dan Brown's religious beliefs are!
And Bobby, I think it's about time that you look at at least one other source than the Da Vinci Code. I looked at several. You're arguement still doesn't hold any credibility unless you consider all the points and all the points of view and look at some of the facts. Good luck in your research.
You still haven't addressed many of teh arguements in my comments! I always answer all of yours. Who's more credible? Pretty obvious if you ask me.
And Why do you say I need a history lesson? I'm the only one who's actually used history or historical fact in my arguement. You've yet to mention that history or fact exists! You also use a fictional book as your only source. Shame.
Things like these are why you're a hypacrit. You say one thing, and you do another. For example, saying that I need a history lesson.
You also said that you believed in what the Da Vinci Code says, then said that it was too ridiculous to believe. Or it might have been the other way around. It has changed several times.
You said I had a closed mind, and have never consulted a source other than the Da Vinci Code.
You said I needed to be more tolerant, and insulted 2 billion people just because of what they believe.
You said that Dan Brown got his facts straight, then said the Code was too ridiculous to believe, then said that dates were opinion.
Who's keeping track here? Well, I said you were a hypacrit, then proved it with fact. JUST GIVE UP YOU LOSE!
6:24 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home