The Aftermath
While the war is over, there is still tension between Waldo and Myself. I hope that this tension will soon die down. Both sides claimed victory. Waldo said that he won because he had more facts than I. Perhaps he did, but about what? Things irrelevant to the Da Vinci Code. I claimed victory due to the lack of knowledge Waldo had about The Da Vinci Code. It appears there will never be a resolution. Basiaclly it was a stalemate.
Fidel Giamatti is back, and still blabbing on about Mumia. I sense a possible blog war about that topic in the near future. Guilty or Innocent? Who knows. But each side has arguments worth considering. Guess thats all I have to say. Peace.
posted by Bobby M at 5:35 PM
3 Comments:
Your arguement deserves no respect because you give the arguements of others no respect. "Give and you shall recieve." I have at least read excerps from the book and given it a fair chance. There is stuff on the other side I have also read, and you haven't even read excerps. You didn't even know they existed, which is PURE lack of knowledge. There's two sides to every arguement. If you don't acknowledge that, you have no credibility.
According to you, I definitely won. You said it was lack of knowledge vs. facts. Both of these things are about me, which I hope you will realize, shows how little you actually said. The real catch is that I really did have facts, and you had NONE and while I lacked some knowledge, you didn't even know there was another side. I think we can agree on that. If you really hope the fighting will end, just admit you lost. I won't hold it against you.
6:21 PM
I know I keep on saying it, but you really don't get it. I'VE READ MORE ABOUT YOU'RE SIDE THAN YOU HAVE ABOUT MY SIDE! Any time you criticize me for not reading the book it is PURE hypacrisy. You know it. That's why you've never mentioned it in any of your comments. Or at least I hope you know it. Otherwise, you're just dumb.
And I do know the story quite well. I'd be prepared any time to give you a full summary. You, however don't know the other arguement. And if you say my facts are irrelevent, you obviously don't understand this "debate" at all. DEBATE THESIS: "People should not believe what the Da Vinci Code says, or use it as anti-Catholic propaganda; because it is a fiction book and is not based on fact at all."
If you understand what I am trying to say, than you see how proving the fiction as fiction is how I won this "disscussion."
And there obviously is such thing as fact. That's just plain silly. "Yeah, Big Lee, there's no such thing as fact. And man never walked on the moon either."
9:23 PM
This is wierd. I have to tell you over and over again not to say things over and over again! I've already addressed this silly, hypacritical claim, and I don't want to do it again. Oh well. You obviously didn't comprehend any of my comments, or you'd realize you can't criticize my arguement unless you'veread any of the several books about fiction in the code, watched one of the TV specials, or even read a summary. I've read more of and about the code than you have of these sources, therefore making that silly arguement of yours nonsensical and hypacritical. You can't acuse me of something you are much more guilty of yourself. It just doesn't make sense. I expect that you'll never give me that arguement again, or it will just be giving in and proving me true.
And that thesis I gave you wasn't so unreasonable. Most Code fans would agree with it, and I don't see why you don't. Then this silly disscussion will finally be over.
9:37 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home